Nam June Paik, The More the Better, 1988.
Doctoral student Rotem Rozental will participate in the symposium Beyond Representation: Photography, Humans & Computers, held at the Centre for Media & Culture Research at London South Bank University in association with the journal Philosophy of Photography this coming May. Rotem’s talk is titled “Silence of the Lost Object.”
Doctoral student Yuri Chang presented a paper at Deception, the 12th Annual East Asian Studies Graduate Student Conference at the University of Toronto in March. Her talk, “Olympic and Nam June Paik: The Imagined Future of Korea as the Spectacle of Deception,” addressed a section of her ongoing dissertation research.
Assistant Professor Julia Walker will be co-chairing a panel at the annual meeting of the Society of Architectural Historians in Buffalo next year. Please see below for the call for papers. Full submission information can be found here.
Modern Architecture and the Book
Describing Eugène Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc’s Dictionary of French Architecture from the 11th to the 16th Century, Frank Lloyd Wright wrote, “That book was enough to keep, in spite of architects, one’s faith alive in architecture.” Yet what was the nature of the architectural books produced in Wright’s own time, when faiths of all kinds were put to the test and when conventional media were under assault? How did architects and theorists reconcile the traditions of architectural literature with what they perceived as a wholly new social landscape, demanding both innovative built forms and novel modes of communication? What visual experience did they believe inhered in the form of the book that made it indispensable to the development of the new architecture?
This panel will investigate the use of the book to document, describe, promote, and critique modern architecture from its inception at the end of the nineteenth century to its alleged death in the late twentieth century. Despite the apparent conflict between modern design and the conservative traditions of bookmaking, publications from Antonio Sant’Elia’s Futurist Architecture to Nicolas Pevsner’s Pioneers of the Modern Movement to the Bauhausbücher sought to capture the dynamism of the modern visual experience. Making use of incipient visual technologies—in particular, photography—and new principles of typography and graphic design, these books not only taught their readers what counted as modern architecture, but also instructed them in how to look at it. Papers may address the ways in which authors transform the book format; how such publications experiment with the visual and cognitive processes of viewing a book; or the nature of the audiences they sought to reach.
Please send proposals/abstracts to:
Julia Walker, Assistant Professor, Department of Art History, Binghamton University; email@example.com; and Pepper Stetler, Assistant Professor, Department of Art, Miami University; firstname.lastname@example.org.
Proposals for papers due to session chairs by June 1, 2012.
Thanks to all who made last weekend’s conference a success! Click below to link to the gallery.
“Theater of Doubt: The Palast der Republik’s Architectural Unconscious”
Wednesday, May 2, 5:15 pm
After the Palast der Republik (built between 1973 and 1976 to house the German Democratic Republic’s parliament in Berlin) was doomed to demolition in 2003, a burst of artistic activity occurred within the building’s flamboyant marble-and-glass walls. Figures such as Thomas Demand, Olafur Eliasson, and Tacita Dean contributed meditations on the Palast’s short, tragic life, frequently in the form of trenchant critiques aimed at the German government’s ongoing repression of the city’s Soviet past. While often invoked in analyses of Berlin’s politics of reunification and in discussions of contemporary art practices, these projects in fact provide a surprisingly thorough (if unconscious) analysis of the modernist architecture that frames them. Staged in what Khadija Carroll La has called the “demolition theater” of the Palast der Republik, these works expose more than just the memory politics that dominated aesthetic discourse in post-Wende Berlin; they also reveal the contradictions of modern architecture at the very site of its own spectacular failure.
Julia Walker is Assistant Professor of Art History at Binghamton University.
“Conversations in Career Opportunities: How to Get into Urban Rehabilitation and Historic Preservation”
Wednesday, May 2, 3:00-4:30 p.m., FA 258
Please join us for a conversation with five professionals in the city of Binghamton who will share personal stories about how they were drawn to urban renewal and historic preservation from different career paths. Organized in conjunction with Associate Professor Karen Barzman‘s ARTH 496, this is an opportunity for students to explore how they might use their own skills and background in art history and architecture to create exciting career opportunities in a variety of urban settings. Q&A will follow the presentations. Light refreshments will be served.
Assistant Director of Economic Development
City of Binghamton
H. Peter L’Orange
Historic Preservation Planner
City of Binghamton
Preservation Association of the Southern Tier
Gerald R. Smith
Broome County Historian
Broome County Public Library
Sarah Grace Cambell, Esq.
Special Counsel – Zoning, Land Use, Development
Hinman, Howard & Kattell L.L.P.
Binghamton, New York
Last week Marcia Focht, Curator of Visual Resources, attended the Visual Resources Association’s Annual Conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico in her role as Secretary of the Executive Board of the Association. While there, Focht was recognized at the Annual Business Meeting for thirteen years of service as the Association’s Mentor Program Coordinator.
More information at http://www.vraweb.org/conferences/vra30/
Please join us for the annual Ferber Lecture this Thursday, April 26 from 5:30-7:00 in the Anderson Center Reception Room. Anthony Cutler, Evan Pugh Professor of Art History, Pennsylvania State University, will speak on “The Empire of Things: Gifts and Gift Exchange Across Byzantium, Early Islam, and the Medieval West.” Free and open to the public; reception at 4:30. Co-sponsored by the Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Art History Department, the Fernand Braudel Center and the History Department. Contact Barbara Knighton, CEMERS, at 607-777-2730 or email@example.com.
The art historian faces a dilemma: we possess scores of medieval objects supposed by their curators/historians to have been gifts and, conversely, hundreds of references (usually quite unspecific) in Arabic, Greek and Latin literature to things (artifactual, human, and zoological) transmitted either domestically or “internationally.” Can and should these categories be related to each other? In the face of a huge body of secondary literature on gift theory written in the wake of Marcel Mauss’s Essai sur le don, I propose to restore to surviving objects some of the quiddity that they possess and, at the same time, to see how, in part or in whole, they conform to or strain the theoretical structures that have been erected upon and about them on material and textual bases. Clearly, nonetheless, the quiddity of things is something that has to be transcended. If such things are culturally shaped, how and under what circumstances is it possible to posit a “shared culture of objects”?